THE DAY BEFORE
THE DAILY INFAMY | DAY BEFORE | BAD APPLES | NEWS | Contact  | LYNX | WEEK THAT WAS | MONTH THAT | THE YEAR | THE DECADE... | THE CENTURY | GuestS | NUREMBURG APPLE TRIAL | DATE LINES | GREEN FROG | Photo5  | QUOTES

 
 
Published on Tuesday, February 8, 2005 by The New Yorker
Outsourcing Torture
The Secret History of America’s “Extraordinary Rendition” Program
by Jane Mayer
Published on Tuesday, February 8, 2005 by The New Yorker
 

On January 27th, President Bush, in an interview with the Times, assured the world that “torture is never acceptable, nor do we hand over people to countries that do torture.” Maher Arar, a Canadian engineer who was born in Syria, was surprised to learn of Bush’s statement. Two and a half years ago, American officials, suspecting Arar of being a terrorist, apprehended him in New York and sent him back to Syria, where he endured months of brutal interrogation, including torture. When Arar described his experience in a phone interview recently, he invoked an Arabic expression. The pain was so unbearable, he said, that “you forget the milk that you have been fed from the breast of your mother.”

Arar, a thirty-four-year-old graduate of McGill University whose family emigrated to Canada when he was a teen-ager, was arrested on September 26, 2002, at John F. Kennedy Airport. He was changing planes; he had been on vacation with his family in Tunisia, and was returning to Canada. Arar was detained because his name had been placed on the United States Watch List of terrorist suspects. He was held for the next thirteen days, as American officials questioned him about possible links to another suspected terrorist. Arar said that he barely knew the suspect, although he had worked with the man’s brother. Arar, who was not formally charged, was placed in handcuffs and leg irons by plainclothes officials and transferred to an executive jet. The plane flew to Washington, continued to Portland, Maine, stopped in Rome, Italy, then landed in Amman, Jordan.

During the flight, Arar said, he heard the pilots and crew identify themselves in radio communications as members of “the Special Removal Unit.” The Americans, he learned, planned to take him next to Syria. Having been told by his parents about the barbaric practices of the police in Syria, Arar begged crew members not to send him there, arguing that he would surely be tortured. His captors did not respond to his request; instead, they invited him to watch a spy thriller that was aired on board.

Ten hours after landing in Jordan, Arar said, he was driven to Syria, where interrogators, after a day of threats, “just began beating on me.” They whipped his hands repeatedly with two-inch-thick electrical cables, and kept him in a windowless underground cell that he likened to a grave. “Not even animals could withstand it,” he said. Although he initially tried to assert his innocence, he eventually confessed to anything his tormentors wanted him to say. “You just give up,” he said. “You become like an animal.”


TORTURED
Maher Arar, a 32-year-old Canadian citizen arrested during a stopover at New York's Kennedy airport on Sept. 26, 2002 as he was traveling to Montreal from Tunisia. Arar was deported to Syria, where he was tortured.
A year later, in October, 2003, Arar was released without charges, after the Canadian government took up his cause. Imad Moustapha, the Syrian Ambassador in Washington, announced that his country had found no links between Arar and terrorism. Arar, it turned out, had been sent to Syria on orders from the U.S. government, under a secretive program known as “extraordinary rendition.” This program had been devised as a means of extraditing terrorism suspects from one foreign state to another for interrogation and prosecution. Critics contend that the unstated purpose of such renditions is to subject the suspects to aggressive methods of persuasion that are illegal in America including torture.

Arar is suing the U.S. government for his mistreatment. “They are outsourcing torture because they know it’s illegal,” he said. “Why, if they have suspicions, don’t they question people within the boundary of the law?”

Rendition was originally carried out on a limited basis, but after September 11th,

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0208-27.htm

Published on Tuesday, February 8, 2005 by the Guardian (UK)
Fraud and Corruption
Forget the UN. The US Occupation Regime Helped Itself to $8.8b of Mostly Iraqi Money in Just 14 Months
by George Monbiot
 

The Republican senators who have devoted their careers to mauling the United Nations are seldom accused of shyness. But they went strangely quiet on Thursday. Henry Hyde became Henry Jekyll. Norm Coleman's mustard turned to honey. Convinced that the UN is a conspiracy against the sovereignty of the United States, they had been ready to launch the attack which would have toppled the hated Kofi Annan and destroyed his organization. A report by Paul Volcker, the former chairman of the US federal reserve, was meant to have proved that, as a result of corruption within the UN's oil-for-food program, Saddam Hussein was able to sustain his regime by diverting oil revenues into his own hands. But Volcker came up with something else.

 

Kay Warns U.S. Not to Repeat Iraq Mistakes in Iran

 

 http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=

AX1XUG2PIJ4ROCRBAEZSFEY?type=topNews&storyID=7558781

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. official who declared the White House's hunt for illicit weapons in Iraq to be a failure driven by faulty intelligence has warned the Bush administration against repeating its mistakes in the current war of words with arch-foe Iran.

"There is an eerie similarity to the events preceding the Iraq war," David Kay, who led the search for banned weapons of mass destruction in postwar Iraq, said on Monday in an opinion piece in The Washington Post.

"Nuclear weapons in the hands of Iran would be a grave danger to the world. That is not what is in doubt," he wrote.

"What is in doubt is the ability (of) the U.S. government to honestly assess Iran's nuclear status and to craft a set of measures that will cope with that threat short of military action by the United States or Israel," Kay added.

President Bush justified

 

 


The Spinners, Casting Their Versions of the Vote in Iraq

By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 1, 2005; Page C01

Less than an hour before the Iraqi polls closed, correspondent Jim Maceda was reporting on MSNBC that some voters were so afraid that they asked if they could sneak in the back of a polling station. At almost the same moment, CNN's Jane Arraf was interviewing a man who was proud to talk about his vote in front of a camera.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A52895-2005Jan31.html

 

 

 

“The big television networks have been given a list of five polling stations

"According to Robert Fisk of the Independent, a major British daily newspaper, “The big television networks have been given a list of five polling stations where they will be ‘allowed’ to film. Close inspection of the list shows that four of the five are in Shiite Muslim areas—where the polling will probably be high—and one in an upmarket Sunni area, where it will be moderate.” Sunni working class areas were entirely off limits, he noted."

I myself was amazed yesterday, Sunday, January 30/05, to see on NBC, a report from a polling station in Ramadi, a town of 700,000, where not a single voter showed up until 11 AM, a total of 1,700 voted in that city of 700,000. So the usually so reliable old hand Robert Fisk is probably correct.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/jan2005/iraq-j3 [...]

http://www.juancole.com/2005/01/mixed-story-im-just-appalled-by.html

 

 

Under Pressure, Qatar May Sell Jazeera Station

By STEVEN R. WEISMAN

Published: January 30, 2005

WASHINGTON - The tiny state of Qatar is a crucial American ally in the Persian Gulf, where it provides a military base and warm support for American policies. Yet relations with Qatar are also strained over an awkward issue: Qatar's sponsorship of Al Jazeera, the provocative television station that is a big source of news in the Arab world

 
WHAT I  LOVE IN  THIS STORY IS THAT VEEP [PHEASANT-KILLER] CHENEY  IS UPSET THAT BAD OLD AL  JEZZA
http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage IS NOT TELLING THE TRUTH, OH MEE GAWD, ME SACRED GREEN FROG! 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Printer Friendly Version  E-Mail This Article
 
 
Published on Friday, January 28, 2005 by Reuters
Arabs Say Iraq Vote Gives Democracy a Bad Name
by Tom Perry
 

CAIRO - President Bush sees Sunday's election in Iraq as a beacon for freedom in the Middle East, but Arab reformers say the poll will set back their cause.

Arab human rights activists say the Iraqi election is deeply flawed and will give democracy a bad name. They say violence and the prospect of a Sunni Arab boycott will undermine the poll. Many Arabs, already suspicious of U.S. intentions in Iraq, are also dismissing the vote's credibility because of the presence of the 150,000 U.S. troops there.


Many Arabs think elections held under U.S. occupation can only produce a government similar to the U.S.-backed interim government, which they view as an American puppet.

"The influence of the elections for us as democrats is disastrous," Syrian human rights activist Haytham Manna told Reuters from Paris. "When you marginalize wide sections of society from the political process ... this is not democracy."

"With this example, all the Arab extremists will say to us: 'You

 
 
 
 
Another Iraqi cul-de-sac
By Dilip Hiro

Iraq's National Assembly poll this Sunday is already set to become but the latest in a series of "turning points" touted by the administration of US President George W Bush, which in reality turn out to be cul-de-sacs. Starting with Saddam Hussein's arrest in December 2003, each of Washington's rosy scenarios - in which a diminution of violence is predicted and a path to success declared - has turned to dust. These include the transfer of sovereignty to Iraqis last June 28, the "Iraqification" of the country's security apparatus (an ongoing theme), and the recapture of Fallujah, described as the prime font of the Sunni insurgency, last November
.
 
 
 

The Iraq election: a travesty of democracy

By James Cogan
27 January 2005

 The January 30 elections in Iraq have nothing to do with democracy. To claim a “free” election can take place in Iraq is no different to asserting that the French, Yugoslav or Greek people could have elected a representative government in 1942 while living under the jackboot of Nazi rule.

Over the past two years, Iraq has been subjected to invasion and a military occupation that has plunged the country into a social and political catastrophe. The Bush administration has brought the Iraqi people 50 to 70 percent unemployment, food and fuel shortages, a breakdown in essential services such as electricity, a collapse in basic law-and-order and dictatorial forms of rule little changed from those of the Baathist regime.

The US invasion of 2003 was launched not to bring “liberation”, but to establish US dominance over the country’s oil resources and transform it into an American client state and military base in the Middle East. Legitimate resistance to the country’s takeover is the main factor behind the guerilla war that has been fought against US forces for close to two years. Due to both Iraq’s experience with colonialism in the twentieth century and the reality of the occupation, millions of Iraqis bitterly oppose the US presence in the country.

The US military and its local collaborators

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/jan2005/elec-j27.shtml

 
 
 
NOt too much INFAMY TODAY, A BIT OF RELIEF below:
 
 
In Iraq Election, Tense Media Put On A Short Leash

by Joe Hagan

In case television news producers barricaded in fortified hotels in Baghdad needed to be reminded that Iraq is unsafe, the country’s Ministry of Interior issued a memo on Jan. 18 warning that Iraq would not assume liability for any American media outlets on the scene for the Jan. 30 elections. "News agencies that decide to cover elections will do so with the full understanding that the situation in Iraq is atypical," the memo explained.

But on Election Day, the situation....

 
 
 
 

 ON THE 150TH ANNIVERSARY of Walden, several new editions of the classic were published. Some are elegantly footnoted or designed. Others explore the recurring significance of Thoreau as a mirror reflecting America's nature, and Barksdale Maynard's detailed history of Walden Pond itself contains invaluable new material for students of Thoreau.

Rachel Carson kept Walden by her bedside. Annie Dillard wrote her master's thesis about Walden Pond. Allen Ginsberg and Jack Kerouac were affected by it in their early years, as was Pete Seeger. Arlo Guthrie named his cat after Henry; my wife named a dog. Besides these individuals, millions of anonymous backpackers carry their own paperback editions of Walden wherever they seek respite.

These days Thoreau is mainly remembered for the self-conscious life he lived, and for his vital role in the creation of environmentalism. In his own time he embodied ideas that others merely discussed in their parlors. The liquid clarity of Thoreau's sentences arose from the natural simplicity in which he was grounded.

 
 
Beyond the poll
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1398391,00.html

After the Iraqi election will come a campaign to convince people of its credibility, writes Ewen MacAskill

Tuesday January 25, 2005

The hopes of the US, Britain and the Iraqi transitional government that Sunday's election will be as credible as possible suffered a fresh setback today. The Swiss organisers of the poll of Iraqis living outside of Iraq disclosed today that fewer than a quarter of those eligible had registered to vote.

If those who can vote in relative safety do not bother to

 
 
 
Torture in Iraq Still Routine, Report Says

Detainees Beaten, Hung by Wrists, Shocked by Security Forces, Rights Group Finds

By Doug Struck
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, January 25, 2005; Page A10

BAGHDAD, Jan. 24 -- Twenty months after Saddam Hussein's government was toppled and its torture chambers unlocked, Iraqis are again being routinely beaten, hung by their wrists and shocked with electrical wires, according to a report by a human rights organization.

Iraqi police, jailers and intelligence agents, many of them holding the same jobs they had under Hussein, are "committing systematic torture and other abuses" of detainees, Human Rights Watch said in a report to be released Tuesday.

 
 
 
Poor poor Ahmed Chalabi, arrested for defaming .... you could see it coming... the Iraqi ministry of [what?] defense, a definition that for once rings true, thus eliminating an entire list in the Jan 30 election
 
 
 
 
The Pentagon's Hersh Rhetoric
 

The Pentagon is doing its best to knock down Seymour Hersh's report in the latest New Yorker that covert U.S. teams are already in Iran scouting targets for the next exciting installment of the "global war on terrorism" (or "GWOT," as the boys in brass apparently call it).

But like a failed test of the missile defense system, the DoD's protests notably miss the heart of Hersh's claims.

Hersh, quoting his usual assortment of high-level and unnamed sources, reports that under a new regime of secret rules, Don Rumsfeld has won the authority to orchestrate black-bag ops "against suspected terrorist targets in as many as ten nations in the Middle East and South Asia," free from the congressional oversight to which CIA activities are subject. And Iran is the first stop:

    The Administration has been conducting secret reconnaissance missions inside Iran at least since last summer. Much of the focus is on the accumulation of intelligence and targeting information on Iranian nuclear, chemical, and missile sites, both declared and suspected. The goal is to identify and isolate three dozen, and perhaps more, such targets that could be destroyed by precision strikes and short-term commando raids.

But covert operations aren't the only options. "The Pentagon's contingency plans for a broader invasion of Iran are also being updated," Hersh continues, although he notes that these plans would have to be revised even if immediate action were not contemplated, given that the U.S. now has a ready launch pad for invading Iran: Iraq.

For those looking for the fingerprints of the neocons, Hersh adds: "The immediate goals of the attacks would be to destroy, or at least temporarily derail, Iran's ability to go nuclear. But there are other, equally purposeful, motives at work. The government consultant told me that the hawks in the Pentagon, in private discussions, have been urging a limited attack on Iran because they believe it could lead to a toppling of the religious leadership."

The Pentagon, dogged by Hersh's work from the heady days of My Lai to the icky events at Abu Ghraib, said in a statement from spokesman Larry Di Rita, "Mr. Hersh's article is so riddled with errors of fundamental fact that the credibility of his entire piece is destroyed."

When it comes to Hersh's report that Doug Feith, one of the top neocons at DoD, is cooperating with Israeli officials on the plans to slam Iran, Di Rita accuses Hersh of "building on links created by the soft bigotry of some conspiracy theorists." (Israeli military intelligence says it believes Iran might have da bomb by 2007.)

Then it gets personal: "By his own admission, Mr. Hersh evidently is working on an 'alternative history' novel. He is well along in that work, given the high quality of 'alternative present' that he has developed in several recent articles."

Oooo, snap! But Di Rita finishes with a big dodge: "Mr. Hersh's preference for single, anonymous, unofficial sources for his most fantastic claims makes it difficult to parse his discussion of Defense Department operations."

Not really; Hersh says we have teams in Iran looking for targets for acts of war. Seems like a yes or no would do.

Posted by Murphy at 10:35 AM, January 18, 2005

 

The great scam of Social Security Reform is upon us: ah, just think of how the lowering of wages to the "Chinese Standard" will increase enlistment in the Armed Forces.

This is the week to make your voice heard! Confirmation hearings on the nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General begin Wednesday, January 5.  If you haven't already contacted your representatives, click here to send a letter (or paste http://www.ccr-ny.org/actionalert into your browser).

 

JANUARY  2005

Happy Valentine's to One & All

And this quote:
"It was from here (Fort Simcoe) the United States cavalry roamed the Yakima Valley, lynching ... Yakama men and leaving their bodies hanging from the trees as a reminder to the tribe that they were subjugated."
 
which derives from this story:
Great photo of the horses, too!
 
The re-inauguration of the impetuous and irresponsible Texan is nearly upon us. There is a counter-inauguration in the works:
 
 
which I regret not being able to attend.

 



E-mail: http://www.roloff.freeservers.com
Web Site: http://www.handke.scriptmania.com